Cooper-Eromanga Basin EcoTypes
Created: 19 Nov 2024 Revised: 15 Jan 2025

Ecosystem types (i.e. vegetation-landscape ecotypes) of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin region. This dataset is part of a DEW/DEM project that describes and maps the native flora and fauna communities of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin of South Australia. In...

Ecosystem types (i.e. vegetation-landscape ecotypes) of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin region. This dataset is part of a DEW/DEM project that describes and maps the native flora and fauna communities of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin of South Australia. In past decades, regional conservation planning and environmental assessments by natural resource managers and energy industries were constrained by the lack of consistent and spatial information on the biodiversity assets of the region. Prior to this work, vegetation mapping and ecosystem information were unavailable for large portions of the region (54 000 km²), especially within Strzelecki Desert and Cooper Creek channel country. During 2016-17, this study collated biological and environmental information from government and industry sources, identified gaps in existing information, conducted new surveys in priority landscapes, analysed relationships between flora and fauna and their environment, identified dominant ecosystems (i.e. vegetation and landscapes) and their associated flora and fauna species, mapped the distribution of ecosystems, and identified areas with highest risk of disturbance (including conservation-listed species under federal and state legislation). This new information improves our understanding regional biodiversity for conservation planning and natural resource management decisions, and facilitates more efficient and scientifically-robust environmental assessments of petroleum/geothermal or pastoral development activities, and vegetation clearance/offset proposals in the region.

More +

About this record

Record No mesac200
Topic Environment
Type of Resource Dataset
Category Type
Document Type
Contributor
Sponsor
Tenement
Tenement Holder
Operator
Geological Province
    Other
    Mine Name
    Stratigraphy
    Commodity
      Notes
      
                          
                          
      
                          
                        
      Language English
      Metadata Standard ISO 19115-3

      Citations

      Use constraints License
      License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
      Persistent identifier https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/dataset/mesac200
      Citation Cooper-Eromanga Basin EcoTypes
      https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/dataset/mesac200

      Technical information

      Status Completed
      Maintenance and Update Frequency
      Geographic Reference GDA2020 (EPSG:7844)
      Geo bounding box {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[141.1,-25.9],[138.9,-25.9],[138.9,-29.6],[141.1,-29.6],[141.1,-25.9]]]}
      Purpose
      This data is designed as an aid to improve our understanding regional biodiversity for conservation planning and natural resource management decisions. Facilitates more efficient and scientifically-robust environmental assessments of...
      This data is designed as an aid to improve our understanding regional biodiversity for conservation planning and natural resource management decisions. Facilitates more efficient and scientifically-robust environmental assessments of petroleum/geothermal or pastoral development activities, and vegetation clearance/offset proposals in the region.

      More +

      Lineage
      Based on methodology described by Hobbs TJ, Armstrong D, Wenham D, Howell S, Spencer J, Maconochie J, Facelli F, Brandle R, Bowen Z & Fitzgerald L (2017). Flora and fauna communities of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin, DEWNR Technical report...
      Based on methodology described by Hobbs TJ, Armstrong D, Wenham D, Howell S, Spencer J, Maconochie J, Facelli F, Brandle R, Bowen Z & Fitzgerald L (2017). Flora and fauna communities of the Cooper-Eromanga Basin, DEWNR Technical report 2017/23, Government of South Australia, Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources / Department of the Premier and Cabinet, Adelaide. Data sources: DEWNR Biological Databases of South Australia (2017); Atlas of Living Australia (2016); Landsat satellite imagery (1987-2015); Soil and Landscape Grid of Australia (2015); Interim Biogeographic Regions of Australa (2012).
      Positional accuracy:0.000278 degrees
      Attribute accuracy:Maximum likelihood classification of 28 ecotype models. Some mis-classifications may occur at the local scale. Local patches of gridcells should inspected and compared with high-resolution satellite imagery. Where obvious mis-classifications occur users should review neighbouring gridcells and allied ecotypes to refine interpretation of mapping.
      Logical consistency:28 ecotypes classes, 1 persistent water class (>75% of time)
      Data is gridded at ~30 m cell size and interpretations should not be made at scales less than this.

      More +

      Attribute details

      Name Definition
      Count Number of cells
      Ecotype ID Unique numeric identifier for each ecotype
      Ecotype Unique text identifier for each ecotype
      Formation National Vegetation Information System (NVIS) vegetation formation description
      EcoName Short descriptive name
      Study Area km2 Area of each ecotype within the study area (km²)
      Native taxa Number of native taxa associated with the ecotype
      ConsList taxa Number of conservation-listed taxa associated with the ecotype
      Introduced_taxa Number of introduced taxa associated with the ecotype
      FLORA Native taxa Number of native flora taxa associated with the ecotype
      FLORA ConsList taxa Number of conservation-listed flora taxa associated with the ecotype
      FLORA Introduced taxa Number of introduced flora taxa associated with the ecotype
      FAUNA Native taxa Number of native fauna taxa associated with the ecotyp
      FAUNA ConsList taxa Number of conservation-listed fauna taxa associated with the ecotype (all taxa)
      FAUNA ConsList wetland taxa Number of conservation-listed fauna taxa associated with the ecotype (wetland taxa)
      FAUNA Introduced taxa Number of introduced fauna taxa associated with the ecotype
      Wetland Wetland type associated with the ecotype
      VegName Scientific names of dominant flora species (long form)
      VegCommon Common names of dominant flora species (long form)
      VegNameS Scientific names of most dominant flora species (short form)
      VegCommonS Common names of most dominant flora species (short form)
      VegNameL Scientific and common names of dominant flora species (long form)
      EnvName Dominant landforms and soils (long form)
      EnvNameS Most dominant landforms and soils (short form)
      Sites Number of vegetation survey sites included in this ecotype
      TreeCover Mean cover of trees recorded at survey sites (%)
      MalleeCover Mean cover of mallees recorded at survey sites (%)
      ShrubCover Mean cover of taller shrubs (>1m) recorded at survey sites (%)
      LowShrubCover Mean cover of low shrubs (<1m) recorded at survey sites (%)
      GrassCover Mean cover of sedges recorded at survey sites (%)
      ForbCover Mean cover of forbs recorded at survey sites (%)
      RiskSoilErosion Risk of soil erosion due to disturbance of soil surfaces (index
      RiskPlantBiomass Risk of loss of plant biomass from physical disturbance (index
      RiskRecruitment Risk of soil moisture limitations to perennial plant species germination and recruitment events (index
      RiskAverage Average biophysical risk of soil erosion