Wintinna Coalfield hydrogeological and geotechnical study.
Published: 05 Dec 1983 Created: 11 Nov 2024 Revised: 11 Nov 2024

This study has formulated a geotechnical and hydrogeological model of the Wintinna Coalfield which satisfies the following objectives: - to provide answers to the hydrogeological and geotechnical questions raised by Fluor in their mining study;...

This study has formulated a geotechnical and hydrogeological model of the Wintinna Coalfield which satisfies the following objectives: - to provide answers to the hydrogeological and geotechnical questions raised by Fluor in their mining study; - to provide confirmation of Fluor's mine design parameters; and - to provide sufficient information to allow further detailed mining studies. Fluor's mining study has provided design concepts and cost estimates for a 2 or 4 Mt/a underground mine and a 6 Mt/a open cut mine. Mining was assumed to commence in the area adjacent to the Arckaringa Homestead and to then progress in a north-easterly direction. For underground mining it was assumed access would be via shafts with the possibility of a decline if geotechnical and hydrogeological conditions were suitable. It was assumed that all coal seams except the Isolation (the top seam) could be extracted with development via continuous miners and coal mining by longwall techniques. Panel development would utilise single entries. Open pit mining would be carried out using a combination of methods. The Bulldog Shale, at the top of the sequence, would be drilled and blasted then excavated by an electric shovel into a mobile crusher and conveyed to the dump. Bucketwheel excavators would be used to remove the top 15 m of surface soils and weathered shale, and the Mesozoic sands. The coal measures would be drilled and blasted then handled by shovels and trucks for delivery to the dump (interburden) and in-pit crusher (coal). In-pit dumping would commence as soon as practicable. These proposed mining methods entailed a number of important assumptions and highlighted a number of areas where the geotechnical and hydrogeological aspects were critical. These were: UNDERGROUND MINING - all coal seams and surrounding strata are of sufficient strength for underground mining; - for underground mining, the low competence of the Permian rocks may prove troublesome; - groundwater inflow to an underground mine would not be excessive (greater than 4 Ml/day); - shaft sinking/decline construction is feasible in the bottom sections of the Mesozoic sands; - all coal seams could be extracted. OPEN CUT MINING - dewatering of the overburden is feasible to allow safe, efficient open cut mining and negate potential problems with pit walls and spoil dumps; - hydrogeological and geotechnical constraints permit overall highwall slopes of 38 degrees, and overall operating face slope angles of 12 degrees. Coffey's scope of work and resultant field, laboratory and office investigations were formulated to address these specific areas.

More +

About this record

Record No mesac21001
Topic Geoscientific Information
Type of Resource Document
Category Type
Document Type Mineral Company Report - Mineral Exploration
Contributor Coffey and Partners Pty Ltd
Sponsor Meekatharra Minerals Ltd
Tenement
Tenement Holder Balhoil Nominees Pty Ltd;Meekatharra Minerals Ltd
Operator Meekatharra Minerals Ltd
Geological Province
Mine Name Wintinna coal deposit
Stratigraphy
Commodity coal
Notes
Notes: Initially the field work components of this study involved the drilling of one HQ sized (= 60 mm diameter) fully cored hole, one groundwater production bore, and two piezometer holes.  However, following on-site logging and testing of the...

Notes: Initially the field work components of this study involved the drilling of one HQ sized (= 60 mm diameter) fully cored hole, one groundwater production bore, and two piezometer holes. However, following on-site logging and testing of the drill core and processing of the rock strength data, the geotechnical data acquisition programme was extended to include field and laboratory strength testing of bulk samples obtained by additional drilling of a large diameter (240 mm) cored hole. This was followed by the drilling, logging, sampling, and on-site and laboratory testing of a second, special large diameter cored borehole put down adjacent to the HQ drillhole. Both of the large diameter drillholes were cored only through the coal measure sequence. The work carried out for this study has comprised: - collection, collation and analysis of all existing hydrogeological data including a bore census and general reconnaissance survey; - drilling, logging, sampling and on-site strength testing of an HQ sized fully cored borehole, MC123, to 242.55 m. On-site strength testing included both point load and unconfined compressive tests; - testing and sampling of selected sections of the coal measures from large diameter (240 mm) borehole MCL 136; - logging, testing and sampling of the coal measure sequence from borehole MCL 123; - drilling of one groundwater production bore to approximately 160 m depth, into the major aquifer; - drilling of two piezometer wells for monitoring of the groundwater production bore; - packer permeability testing of the coal measures in the HQ cored borehole and, on completion, conversion of it to a piezometer; - A 24 hour pump test of the groundwater production bore; - conducting a suite of laboratory tests including gradings and hydrometer analysis, Atterberg limit determinations, slake durability, unconfined compressive strength, triaxial shear strength, and direct shear testing of samples of remoulded core; - special unconfined compressive strength testing of samples of the 240 mm drill core; - water quality analysis of groundwater samples obtained from the pump testing and from other bores in the area; - computer-based analyses of mine inflow, spoil dump and high-wall stability; and - interpretation and examination of all test results and analytical data. All relevant data and explanatory notes are included. The results of all logging, sampling and testing are presented in a summary geotechnical log for the two purpose-drilled geotechnical boreholes, MC123 and MCL123. Geographic Locality: Arckaringa Homestead;Mount Barry Station Doc No: Env 08402 p: 354-582 Drillhole: MC123;MCL123;MCL136

More +

Language English
Metadata Standard ISO 19115-3

Citations

Use constraints License
License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
Persistent identifier https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/document/mesac21001
Citation Sullivan, T.D. 1983. Wintinna Coalfield hydrogeological and geotechnical study. Mineral Company Report - Mineral Exploration
https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/document/mesac21001

Technical information

Status
Maintenance and Update Frequency
Geographic Reference GDA2020 (EPSG:7844)
Geo bounding box {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[134.5,-28],[135,-28],[135,-27.5],[134.5,-27.5],[134.5,-28]]]}
Purpose

                    
                    

                    
                  
Lineage