Exploration for diamonds undertaken by Flinders Mines Ltd (as part of the JV agreement made with Tasman Resources) on the subject EL, located about 70 km south of Coober Pedy, commenced with a re-assessment of open file airborne magnetic data in an attempt to identify subtle magnetic signatures associated with possible kimberlites. The data were reprocessed to remove noise and to enhance subtle magnetic features. The results were used to identify a number of key exploration areas where Jurassic kimberlites may have been extruded through the crystalline basement, and may still exist beneath the Jurassic Algebuckina Sandstone. In April 2008, one small 'postage stamp' helimag survey was flown over a prospective magnetic anomaly picked from the regional data, which was believed to have an affinity to a kimberlite pipe magnetic signature. The anomaly was ground checked, and one 10 litre loam heavy mineral sample was collected for diamond indicator mineral (DIM) identification. The purpose of the sampling was to try to detect DIM grains which could have been derived from a secondary (transported) source in the local area, or may have been brought to the surface by bioturbation. The EL 3339 loam sample was found to be negative for DIMs. One anomaly on EL 3339 was selected to be drilled. The drilling programme utilised a KD 150, aircore/RAB capable rig, and took place in March 2009. Two holes for 40 m were completed to test this magnetic target. Neither hole was able to reach basement, due to collapsing sands that created hole instability. Due to the low ranking of the target anomaly, no further drill attempt to reach basement was made. Drill cuttings samples of mature river sands taken from the depth interval 16-19 m in hole FGDH007 were examined for DIMs. The separated heavy mineral concentrate was mineralogically observed, and potentially interesting minerals were picked and sent for microprobe analysis, yielding a positive result for DIMs. Four highly weathered chromite grains and two moderately fresh picroilmenite grains were recovered. The microprobe geochemistry of these grains suggests that they are derived from kimberlite or kindred rock types. However, a proximal source for the grains is regarded as very unlikely.