RB 65/00049 Amdel 00548 Leigh Creek coal burner studies.
Published: 01 Jan 1967 Created: 05 Nov 2024 Revised: 05 Nov 2024

Background At the Thomas Playford Generating Station of the Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) at Port Augusta, difficulty is experienced in maintaining maximum rated output for extended periods. Observations by ETSA staff and research...

Background At the Thomas Playford Generating Station of the Electricity Trust of South Australia (ETSA) at Port Augusta, difficulty is experienced in maintaining maximum rated output for extended periods. Observations by ETSA staff and research conducted by CSIRO have defined reasons for these difficulties and indicated that the problem might be reduced if the combustion efficiency could be increased. Objective The Australian Mineral Development Laboratories undertook to study the operation of pulverised coal burners of the type used at Port Augusta and to suggest ways of increasing the combustion efficiency. The work involved an investigation of the operating characteristics of the burners and the construction of a cold model of one of the burners with which to study flow patterns and to test modifications. Following upon the investigation of the model, modifications were to have been made at the power station. Summary of Work Done Experiments conducted on No. 1 boiler of the Port Augusta “B” Station showed that variations recorded in the oxygen level were probably due to variations in coal quality or quantity or stratification of the gas stream, rather than to variation in the air supply or a fault in the analyser. Analyses of the fuel supply indicated that crossflow between the two ends of the duplex pulveriser mills was not sufficiently serious as to warrant modifications to prevent it. The distribution of solids in the ducts leading to the burners was found to be asymmetrical. The tests revealed that there was no simple correlation between mill age and performance. Work on the model burner showed the flow pattern probably existing in the burner tubes and allowed development of methods of improving the uniformity of solids distribution in the fuel air mixture issuing from the burner mouth. Conclusions The performance of pulveriser mills is not as dependant on time in service since overhaul as had been though, and measurements have enabled the period between overhauls to be increased. The distribution of solids in the gas stream leaving the burners was found to be very uneven. In the model the solids, which should be spread around the full circumference of the tube, a distance of 61 inches, were confined largely to an arc of about 6 inches in length. This condition is unfavourable for combustion as air penetration to the centre of the band of coal will take some time, during which the particles will pass out of the hottest part of the flame. This could be at least partially responsible for the unburnt carbon found in the ash box and the precipitator dust. Extension of the band of solids as far as the furnace wall could lead to hot spots and the associated problems of corrosion and slag deposition. Suggested modifications to burner design have not yet been adopted at the power station. Installation of narrow longitudinal baffles in the burner tube gave sufficient improvement in the cold model to warrant trial on at least one boiler in the “B” station. Recommendations It is recommended that a full study be made of the performance of one or more pulveriser mills over an extended period. The study should include product particle size analyses, assessment of coal hardness and maintenance of records of mill running time and feeder speeds. This could lead to a further useful increase in life of a mill between overhauls. It is also recommended that modifications be made to the design of the burners in the Port Augusta “B” station. Some of the modifications tested on the model offer a considerable improvement over the existing design, and the use of multiple longitudinal baffles in the primary burner tube is recommended as a logical first step.

More +

About this record

Record No rb6500049
Topic Geoscientific Information
Type of Resource Document
Category Type
Document Type Departmental Publication - Geological Survey Geoscience Publication
Contributor
Sponsor
Tenement
Tenement Holder
Operator
Geological Province
    Mine Name
    Stratigraphy
    Commodity coal
    Notes
    Notes: Amdel project: 1/1/93. Copy in Env 4434.
    Geographic Locality: Port Augusta;Leigh Creek
    Doc No: RB 65/00049
    Amdel 00548

    Notes: Amdel project: 1/1/93. Copy in Env 4434. Geographic Locality: Port Augusta;Leigh Creek Doc No: RB 65/00049 Amdel 00548

    Language English
    Metadata Standard ISO 19115-3

    Citations

    Use constraints License
    License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
    Persistent identifier https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/document/rb6500049
    Citation Clayton, J.M. 1967. RB 65/00049 Amdel 00548 Leigh Creek coal burner studies. Departmental Publication - Geological Survey Geoscience Publication. Government of South Australia.
    https://pid.sarig.sa.gov.au/document/rb6500049

    Technical information

    Status
    Maintenance and Update Frequency
    Geographic Reference GDA2020 (EPSG:7844)
    Geo bounding box {"type":"Polygon","coordinates":[[[129,-39],[141,-39],[141,-26],[129,-26],[129,-39]]]}
    Purpose
    
                        
                        
    
                        
                      
    Lineage